Abstract: As a cornerstone discipline of modern medical research, the quality of development in laboratory animal science directly influences the pace of innovation in medicine and related fields. In response to the lack of established frameworks for evaluating scientific and technological performance in laboratory animal institutions, this study aimed to develop a tailored evaluation system. Adopting a disciplinary ontology perspective, the research systematically examined the unique characteristics and developmental patterns of laboratory animal science. Through literature analysis and reference to the Guidelines for the Evaluation of Scientific and Technological Work in Research Institutions issued by the Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Science and Technology, a multi-tiered evaluation framework was constructed. Grounded in the discipline’s intrinsic features and developmental laws, the proposed system centers on two core dimensions—scientific research achievements and technological talent, covering six primary indicators, sixteen secondary indicators and forty-three tertiary indicators. This framework not only reflects the distinct nature of the discipline but also enables precise measurement of disciplinary contributions through differentiated indicator design, thereby offering a valuable reference for relevant authorities in China.

Key words: laboratory animal, research institutions, scientific and technological management, scientific and technological evaluation, evaluation system 

摘要： 实验动物学作为现代医学研究的基石学科,其发展质量直接关系到医学等领域的创新进程。针对当前实验 动物机构科技评价研究相对缺乏的现状,本研究基于学科本体论视角,系统分析了实验动物学的学科特殊性与发 展规律,并结合文献分析及科技部科技评估中心《科研单位科技评价工作规范指引》,构建了一套适用于实验动物 机构的科技评价体系框架。该框架立足于学科特点与发展规律,以科研成果和科技人才为核心维度,共包含6个 一级指标、16个二级指标和43个三级指标。本研究所构建的建议框架不仅突出了学科特性,还通过差异化指标设 计实现了对学科贡献度的精准衡量,可为我国相关部门提供参考。

关键词: 实验动物, 科研机构, 科技管理, 科技评价, 评价体系