Abstract: objective: To design plastic film method, compared plastic film method with other rabbit breeding methods of the pros and cons. Method: After proving the flush type method, using the plastic film method, flush type method, dry raise type method feeding rabbit, determination of different methods rabbit feed room of humidity, and compares three cages work style characteristics. Results: 1. compared the plastic film method to the flush type method, it could reduce the humidity18% 。 2. No difference among the three methods in regard to feeding rabbit. 3. Using the flush type method the workload can reduced by92%, in comparison with the dry raise method. Conclusion: plastic film method has its unique advantages; it can reduce the humidity of the feeding room of the flush type method, and also lighter the workload of the plastic film method. The plastic film method easily elaborate the advantage of the method of both, but also complementary the defect of the both.

Key words: Rabbit cage, Plastic film method, Flush type method, Dry raising type method

摘要： 目的 设计塑料垫布法，比较塑料垫布法与其它家兔饲养方法的优劣。方法 改进冲洗式笼具后，同时用塑 料垫布法、冲洗式法、干养式法饲养家兔，测定不同方法家兔饲养室的湿度，并比较三种笼具工作方式的特征。结 果 1）塑料垫布法与冲洗式法相比，可降低饲养室湿度17％;2）三种方法用于家兔的饲养效果没有差异；3）塑料 垫布法与干养式法相比可减轻劳动量89％ 以上。结论 塑料垫布法有其独有的优势，既降低了冲洗式法的室内湿 度，又减轻了干养式法的工作量，既能发挥干湿法的优点，又互补了两者的缺点。

关键词: 家兔饲养笼具, 塑料垫布法, 冲洗式法, 干养式法