Laboratory Animal Science ›› 2025, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 9-14.DOI: 110.3969/ j. issn.1006-6179.2025.04.002

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Different Feeding Methods on the Growth Performance of SPF Ducks During Chick Rearing and Breeding Period

  

  1. (Harbin Veterinary Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,National Poultry Laboratory Animal Resource Center,State Key Laboratory for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Laboratory Animals and Comparative Medicine,Harbin 150069,China)
  • Received:2025-03-19 Online:2025-08-28 Published:2025-09-10

不同饲养方式对育雏与育成期SPF鸭生长性能的影响

  

  1. (中国农业科学院哈尔滨兽医研究所,国家禽类实验动物资源库,动物疫病防控全国重点实验室, 黑龙江省实验动物与比较医学重点实验室,哈尔滨 150069)
  • 通讯作者: 夏长友(1972—),男,研究员,研究方向为实验动物与比较医学研究。E-mail:xiachangyou@caas.cn。
  • 作者简介:张 伟(1976—),男,助理研究员,研究方向为实验动物环境设施研究。E-mail:zhangwei07@caas.cn。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF0710500);中央引导地方科技发展专项(ZY04JD03)。

Abstract: Objective The experiment aimed to analyze the effects of the two feeding modes on the breeding effect of SPF ducks by comparing the growth of body weight, body slant length, chest depth, chest width and keel length, so as to provide reference for the large-scale production of SPF ducks in the future.Methods One hundred and twenty healthy 1-day-old SPF ducks were divided into 2 groups, with 3 replicates in each group and 20 ducks in each replicate. The first group was fed with isolator (internal air cleanliness level 5), which was referred to as isolated environment feeding group, and the second group was fed with open cage (placed in the feeding room with air cleanliness level 7), which was referred to as barrier environment feeding group, which was raised to 16 weeks of age. During the period, the growth index growth data of SPF ducks under the two method were measured and compared every 4 weeks.Results During the brooding period (0-4 weeks), the growth of body weight and chest depth in the isolated environment feeding group was significantly higher than that in the open cage group (P< 0.01). The growth of body oblique length and chest width was significantly higher than that in the open cage group (P<0.05), while the growth of body weight, chest depth and chest width in the 4-8 weeks was significantly lower than that in the barrier environment feeding group (P<0.01). The growth of chest depth in the 8-12 weeks was significantly lower than that in the barrier environment feeding group (P< 0.01). The growth of body weight and body oblique length in the 12-16 weeks was significantly lower than that in the barrier environment feeding group (P<0.01). And the growth of chest depth and chest width was significantly lower than that in the barrier environment feeding group (P<0.05).Conclusion The growth performance of the isolated environment feeding group is better than that of the barrier environment feeding group in the brood period (0-4 weeks). And the growth performance of the barrier environment feeding group is better than that of the isolated environment feeding group in the adult period (4-16 weeks). 

Key words: SPF duck, feeding mode, growth properties

摘要: 目的 实验旨在通过对比体质量、体斜长、胸深、胸宽和龙骨长指标的增长情况,分析两种饲养模式对SPF鸭 育雏育成效的影响,为今后SPF鸭规模化生产提供参考依据。方法 将120只健康1日龄SPF母鸭分为两组,每 组设3个重复,每个重复20只,隔离环境饲养组(第一组)采用隔离器(内部空气洁净度5级)饲养方式,屏障环境 饲养组(第二组)采用开放式笼具(放置在空气洁净度7级的饲养室内)饲养方式,饲养至16周龄。期间每隔4周 测定并对比两种方式下SPF鸭的生长指标增长数据。结果 在育雏期(0~4周),隔离环境饲养组的体质量和胸深 增长极显著高于开放笼具组(P<0.01),体斜长和胸宽增长显著高于开放笼具组(P<0.05),而4~8周的体质量、胸 深、胸宽增长极显著低于屏障环境饲养组(P<0.01),8~12周的胸深增长极显著低于屏障环境饲养组(P<0.01), 12~16周的体质量和体斜长增长极显著低于屏障环境饲养组(P<0.01),胸深、胸宽增长显著低于屏障环境饲养组 (P<0.05)。结论 在育雏期(0~4周)隔离环境饲养组的生长性能好于屏障环境饲养组,在育成期(4~16周)屏障 环境饲养组的生长性能好于隔离环境饲养组。

关键词: SPF鸭, 饲养方式, 生长性能

CLC Number: