实验动物科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (06): 55-.

• 研究简报 • 上一篇    下一篇

香烟烟雾染毒改良方法的应用

  

  1. 重庆医科大学临床医学院; 重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院; 重庆医科大学实验教学管理中心
  • 出版日期:2019-10-28 发布日期:2020-09-09

Application of improved cigarette smoke exposure method

  • Online:2019-10-28 Published:2020-09-09

摘要: 目的 探讨烟雾染毒的改良方法对小鼠存活率的影响。方法 在普通烟雾染毒方法的基础上,改进制作一种可向染毒箱底部通入空气以增加氧气量,并能同时监测温度的染毒装置。将实验对象昆明系小鼠分为对照组(在普通染毒装置中,不染毒),染毒1组(普通染毒方法),染毒2组(改进的染毒方法)进行实验,应用统计软件SPSS20. 0分析比较各组之间小鼠的生存率、染毒装置内氧浓度以及总悬浮颗粒浓度变化。结果 共选取160只昆明系小鼠,并随机分为对照组40只,染毒1组60只,染毒2组60只,均雌雄各半。实验结果发现,染毒2组小鼠的存活率显著高于染毒1组,差异具有统计学意义(x~2=7. 647 P=0. 02<0. 05),染毒1组装置内的氧浓度明显低于染毒2组氧浓度,且染毒2组装置内的氧浓度波动小,差异具有统计学意义(F=5. 260,P=0. 045<0. 05)。染毒1组和染毒2组装置内的TSP浓度差异没有统计学意义,说明改进的烟雾染毒装置不影响毒物的剂量和染毒过程。结论 改良的烟雾染毒装置会使实验动物在非药物因素作用下的死亡率降低,且不影响实验染毒过程。

关键词: 烟雾染毒, 存活率, 氧浓度

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of the modified method of smoke exposure on the survival rate of mice. Methods: on the basis of the common smoke exposure method, a device for increasing the oxygen quantity and increasing the oxygen amount at the bottom of the contaminated tank and monitoring the temperature simultaneously was made. The object of Kunming mice were divided into control group (not exposed in the common exposure device, exposure group (1), normal exposure method, exposure group (2) were improved) experiment, analyzing the application of spss20.0 statistical software were compared between the survival rate of mice, with oxygen concentration toxic unit and the changes of total the concentration of suspended particles. Results: a total of 160 Kunming mice were selected and randomly divided into 40 groups, 60 rats exposed to 1 groups, 2 rats exposed to 60 groups, both sexes were half and half. The experimental results showed that the survival rate in 2 groups of mice was significantly higher than that in group 1, the difference was statistically significant (x2=7.647 P=0.02<0.05), the oxygen concentration in the 1 groups were significantly lower than the exposure device of oxygen concentration of 2 groups, 2 groups of oxygen concentration fluctuations in the exposure and the device is small, the difference was statistically significant (F=5.260, p=0.045<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the concentration of TSP between the 1 groups and the 2 groups, indicating that the improved smoke exposure device did not affect the dose and exposure process of the toxicant. Conclusion: the improved smoke exposure device will reduce the mortality of the experimental animals under non pharmacological factors, and does not affect the experimental exposure process.

Key words: smoke exposure, survival rate, oxygen concentration