实验动物科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 51-57.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 1006-6179. 2024. 01. 010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

无菌鼠细菌检测方法的选择与探讨

  

  1. (江苏集萃药康生物科技股份有限公司,南京 210061)
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-30 出版日期:2024-02-28 发布日期:2024-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨慧欣( 1981—) ,女,硕士,研究方向为实验动物繁育与生产管理,E-mail:yanghx@ gempharmatech. com。
  • 作者简介:韩 磊( 1996—) ,男,执业兽医师,研究方向为无菌动物检测,E-mail:hanlei@ gempharmatech. com。
  • 基金资助:
    2021 年江苏省实验动物协会项目(DWXH202106 )

Selection and Discussion of Bacterial Detection Methods for Germ-free Mice

  1. ( GemPharmatech Co. , Ltd. , NanJing 210061, China)
  • Received:2022-11-30 Online:2024-02-28 Published:2024-03-15

摘要: 目的 比较培养法、革兰染色镜检法和 16S rRNA PCR 方法对无菌小鼠粪便样品细菌检测的检测性能,为无菌鼠细菌检测方法的选择提供依据。 方法 利用培养法、革兰染色镜检法、16S rRNA PCR 方法,分别检测 GF 小鼠粪便、SPF 小鼠粪便以及已知含菌量的测试样品(无菌小鼠粪便与金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌混合,人为制作而成) ,验证 3 种方法对无菌小鼠粪便中细菌的检测限度;并同时使用 3 种方法检测临床样品,对比 3 种检测方法的优缺点,分析 3 种方法在实际检测中的可行性。 结果 培养法、革兰染色镜检法和 16S rRNA PCR 方法检测灵敏度分别为 102CFU / g、108CFU / g 和 106CFU / g,临床样品检测中阳性率均为 1. 36%(6 / 441) 。 结论 培养法、革兰染色镜检法、16S rRNA PCR 法 3 种检测方法各有优缺点,需要联合使用,取长补短,确保检测结果的可靠。

关键词: 无菌小鼠, 细菌检测, 培养法, PCR, 革兰染色镜检

Abstract: Objective To compare the detection effects of culture method, Gram stain microscopy and 16S rRNA PCR on bacterial detection in fecal samples of germ-free mice,provide a basis for the selection of germile murine bacteria detection method. Method The culture method, Gram stain microscopy and 16S rRNA PCR method were used to detect the feces of GF mice, the feces of SPF mice and the test samples with known bacterial content ( the feces of germ-free mice were mixed with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli, artificially made) , and the detection limits of the three method on bacteria in the feces of germ-free mice were verified. Three method were used to detect clinical samples at the same time, the advantages and disadvantages of the three detection method were compared, and the feasibility of the three method in actual detection was analyzed. Result The sensitivity of culture method, Gram stain microscopy and 16S rRNA PCR method was 102CFU / g, 108CFU / g and 106CFU / g, respectively, and the positive rate of clinical samples was 1. 36% ( 6 / 441 ) . Conclusion Culture method, Gram staining microscopy and 16S rRNA PCR method have their own advantages and disadvantages, and they need to be used in combination to learn from each other ’ s strengths to ensure the reliability of the detection result.

Key words: germ-free mice, sterility test, cultivation method, PCR, gram staining microscopic examination

中图分类号: